The Court held
Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson, in her dissenting opinion, agreed with the Department and the Circuit Court’s “well-analyzed, well-reasoned, and thorough opinion” supporting the Department’s position. Justice Ann Walsh Bradley joined in the dissent.
“I am disappointed by this decision,” Ervin stated. “It is the Department’s responsibility to execute the laws of this state. The Department continues to feel strongly that it acted appropriately in this matter.”
Ervin added, “Unfortunately, the Courts reached a different conclusion regarding the application of sales tax in this case. The Department respects that decision and will review its treatment of similar cases and statutory changes that have occurred since the case was filed.”