By Brian E. Clark
WisBusiness.com
SUN PRAIRIE — William J. Lenling, vice president of Thermal Spray Technologies, isn’t sure if he wants to be the poster boy for the future of Wisconsin industry.
But if Badger State manufacturing is going to thrive in the 21st Century, high-tech companies like TST — which makes engineered coatings for everything from motorcycle gears to medical instruments — will lead the way. To say nothing of producing higher profit margins.
That was one of the main themes of a study released Tuesday by the Wisconsin Manufacturing Partnership. The report, which analyzes the state’s major industries, was financed by grants from the U.S. Economic Development Administration and the Waukesha-based Kern Family Foundation.
“We’re certainly not the only ones who are adding value through technology,” said Lenling, whose company’s roots go back to research he did as a UW-Madison graduate student in the early 1990s.
“But our engineers are always looking for ways to move things forward and to do them better and more efficiently,” said Lenling, whose firm has 75 employees. “We have to do that to compete and thrive.”
John Brandt, CEO of the Ohio-based Manufacturing Performance Institute, directed the 400-plus page report. He said Wisconsin is well-positioned to become a 21st Century industrial leader.
“Wisconsin could be a powerhouse,” said Brandt. “That’s the take-away from this big study.”
Though some of the state’s industries have struggled in recent years, manufacturing remains strong in Wisconsin. In 2004, he said, the state’s 10,000-plus manufacturers industry and related companies employed 512,000 workers and generated more than $46 billion in what he called gross state product.
But for industry to grow to an estimated $54 billion in 2008 and prosper in decades to follow, Badger State manufacturers “must seize the opportunities before it.
“They must adapt to emerging trends in management and technology, and find new ways to compete globally if they want to continue to be a vibrant and vital part of the economy,” he said.
Brandt said companies all over the United States — including Wisconsin — are coming to a “fork in the road.”
He said they can choose to follow a dubious “commodity strategy” by trying to be the lowest cost producer.
“But that only works if you are Wal-Mart,” he said. “If you are not No. 1 or No. 2 in the market, you will slump.”
It is a much wiser policy, he said, to pursue a “value-added strategy,” by which companies like Thermal Spray Technologies enhance the performance of products.
Mike Klonsinski, CEO of WMEP, praised the report for showing which manufacturers are “drivers” and most important to the state’s economy.
“Industry is still a big deal in Wisconsin,” he said. “But we have challenges ahead of us that range from image to regulation to workforce development. This study will help guide us.
“The first thing we need to do is change the way we think about manufacturing,” Klonsinski said. “There is a perception out there that manufacturing is dying — or going away. It’s not.
“But manufacturing is changing. And we’re hopeful that this study will provoke public discussion and heighten awareness on the need to transform our manufacturing sector so it can continue to generate wealth and good jobs for years to come.”
Nick George of Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce said the state’s industries would do well to follow recommendations in the report to upgrade their technology.
“But we also need to get control over rising health care costs, tort reform and tax reform,” he said.
And in addition to engineers and researchers, he said Wisconsin’s schools need to produce graduates who can read and write, count and do basic math and have the responsibility to show up on time.
“If they do that, our state’s manufacturers can train them and do the rest,” he said.
Here are some other highlights of the report:
Recommendations
To capitalize on its 21st century manufacturing potential, the study suggests that Wisconsin needs to create a business climate that fosters growth-oriented manufacturing industries. The study recommends Wisconsin should:
- Build on its driver industries because they are the most competitive and have the greatest potential for growth.
- Create greater focus on manufacturing in government, industry and economic development, including the creation of a bipartisan manufacturing task force in the State Legislature.
- Take immediate action to address skill shortages because the availability of talent is the most important factor for the long-term success of Wisconsin’s driver industries.
- Consider a broad-scale legislative package based on a close examination of the policies affecting driver manufacturing industries and their industry clusters with the goal of supporting Wisconsin manufacturing.